Search for: "Cook v. Andrews" Results 81 - 100 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
In this case there were cooking facilities in both flats, no doubt at least one set of facilities would be shared.While Langford Property Co Ltd v Goldrich [1949] 1 KB 511 was a Rent Act case, on whether two self-contained flats let together could amount to ‘a separate dwelling house’. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
In this case there were cooking facilities in both flats, no doubt at least one set of facilities would be shared.While Langford Property Co Ltd v Goldrich [1949] 1 KB 511 was a Rent Act case, on whether two self-contained flats let together could amount to ‘a separate dwelling house’. [read post]
17 May 2016, 2:27 am by Andres
Functionality is not protected in the UK (see Navitaire v Easyjet), which means that cooking a recipe does not infringe copyright, and also changing things around to produce the same result would not infringe copyright. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Aug. 21, 1998), rev’d, 292 F.3d 1124, 1136-37 (9th Cir. 2002) Swine Flu- GBS Cases Cook v. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am by Garrett Hinck
Michael Bahar, David Cook, Varun Shingari and Curtis Arnold outlined how the Supreme Court’s ruling in Carpenter v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am by Bill Marler
  We represent Andrew Rose, and yes, he is a plumber. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
  This was in the case of Andrew v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:02 am by Margaret Wood
”  However, the 1988 law allowed an exception for documents intended for consumers, which means our cookbooks and cooking stores still traffic in cups and teaspoons measuring sets. [read post]