Search for: "Cork v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2010, 10:33 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:09 am
The article discusses the Texas Supreme Court's recent opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:22 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:55 pm
Oct. 18, 2010), Judge Arpert lists a number of cases cited by the Plaintiff, and left in the Bloomberg Law citations: United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:53 am
Three new petitions granted Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Loosely related state law claims sufficient for supplemental jurisdiction: Von Holdt v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:28 am
Champagne corks may have been popping in Chancery Lane last night, but the success of the Law Society in its challenge to the Legal Services Commission’s family tender process is no more than a small victory in a war that cannot be won.As the UK Human Rights Blog states, the decision "may only serve to delay the inevitable ... with the system of legal aid under enormous budgetary pressure". [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
V. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 8:36 am
Cork v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:34 am
(People (D.P.P.) v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:54 am
Speaking on behalf of the Irish Penal Reform Trust its Executive Director, Liam Herrick, stated that it …believes that, as a general principle, the clear affront to human dignity and the health risk to both staff and prisoners presented by slopping out, combined with a consistent failure of the State to address this issue, demands action. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
United States, 444 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:19 am
Justice McKechnie adds a little diversity to the bench: he is a graduate of University College Cork. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:46 am
Although the European Court of Human Rights this week struck a blow to the marriage equality campaign in Schalk and Kopf v Austria by holding that Article 12 of the ECHR (the right to marriage) did not oblige states to ensure marriage equality, the reasoning was based on the lack of a European consensus on the matter. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:23 am
Nash v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
See, e.g., Hansen v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Well kids it's time to take a deep breath and breathe breathe breathe, in and out, visualize, close your eyes and inhale slowly as you imagine yourself as a cork on the ocean, drifting ever so slightly across a judicial sea, a calm and peaceful sea, where there are frolicking dolphins and rainbows and lollipops and Judge Schwartz and.....Hi, I see you're back.Well let's just jump right in and take a peek at this week's wonderful world of written utterances:BIV… [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:56 am
Utah, 414 U.S. 538 (1974) and Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
Given the state of the art, it was obvious to anyone who needed a stent of this nature that he would have to use taxol. [read post]