Search for: "Corr v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2020, 1:30 am
Officer appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:30 am
Officer appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
Citing New York State Corr. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Citing New York State Corr. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:17 am
See Morales v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:04 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 5:00 am
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 1:10 pm
Corr. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 12:47 pm
The ex post facto clause is "aimed at laws that ‘retroactively alter the definition of crimes or increase the punishment for criminal acts.' " California Dep't of Corr. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:12 pm
Sec'y, Dep't of Corrs., No. 6:07–CV–839–ORL–35–KRS, (M.D.Fla. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:58 am
Candidate [1] Emerald Corr. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:58 am
Candidate [1] Emerald Corr. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:58 am
Candidate [1] Emerald Corr. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Omitting examples of the specific “out-of-title” duties the employee alleges he or she was assigned in his or her out-of-title work grievance is a fatal flawNew York State Corr. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:06 am
Boyd v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:12 pm
” [via LexisOne] State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:49 pm
Corr. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
But Pennsylvania state law seems to follow the Richardson line of reasoning in, Philadelphia Electric Co. v. [read post]
Some guidelines followed by courts in deciding appeals from adverse out-of-title employee grievances
27 Mar 2015, 10:27 am
Some guidelines followed by courts in deciding appeals from adverse out-of-title employee grievancesNew York State Corr. [read post]