Search for: "County of Marin v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(A139222; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Would relatively wealthy Marin County want to subsidize the Sierra communities of Placer and Nevada counties more or less all by itself, without the help of the rest of the Bay Area or the LA or San Diego regions? [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
PG&E owns and operates the Diablo Canyon plant, a two-unit nuclear power plant on 750-acres of land also owned by PG&E near Avila Beach in San Luis Obispo County. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:27 am by Lisa McElroy
  The Court’s decision last Term in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 3:13 pm by Gregory Forman
Superior Court of California, County of Marin, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), the United States Supreme Court held that in-state service was, by itself, sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 15 December, the Supreme Court will hear the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd v State of Libya. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
That is, an accord and satisfaction requires a "dispute as to the amount due and knowing acceptance by the creditor of a lesser amount" (Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v Jet Asphalt Corp., 132 AD2d 296, 303 [1987]; see Marine Midland Bank v Scallen, 161 AD2d 103, 105 [1990]). [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am by thejaghunter
United States Marines only ever voice this sentiment with power and precision. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am by Eugene Volokh
And finally, no mention was made of the 2009 Certificate of Relief From Disabilities which Caputo had received from his sentencing judge in 2009....Interestingly, counsel first argues that the United States Supreme Court’s recent interpretation of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution in two cases, District of Columbia, et al. v. [read post]