Search for: "D. McCulloch"
Results 81 - 100
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2019, 12:00 pm
• John D. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 3:08 pm
Holistic textualism (the document) d. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
Definitely Not Déjà Vu: From 2014’s En Banc to the Panel’s Decision Casual readers not steeped in military commission law may regard Friday’s holding as incongruous, since the full D.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Code: USC Title 26—Internal Revenue Code Subtitle D: Miscellaneous Excise Taxes CHAPTER 48—MAINTENANCE OF MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE§ 5000A. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable on Law, Literature, and Other Performing Arts, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
Compare McCulloch v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:40 pm
See D. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Daniel Webster is thought to have coined that phrase in his oral arguments in the Supreme Court case, McCulloch v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm
In this article the case of McCulloch v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
Anyone interested in charters from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency should be following Lusnak vs. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
If we assume, as Trump does here for the sake of this argument, that Trump is covered by Section 3 and that he did engage in an insurrection—which is what Colorado determined to be the case—then it is much more than reasonable for Colorado to assume, as it did with Abdul Hassan, that Trump cannot and will not assume the office of President, despite the (wholly) theoretical possibility that two-thirds of both Houses might vote to alleviate his… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
If we assume, as Trump does here for the sake of this argument, that Trump is covered by Section 3 and that he did engage in an insurrection—which is what Colorado determined to be the case—then it is much more than reasonable for Colorado to assume, as it did with Abdul Hassan, that Trump cannot and will not assume the office of President, despite the (wholly) theoretical possibility that two-thirds of both Houses might vote to alleviate his… [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onCan this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
“The slickest way in the world to lie is to tell the right amount of truth at the right time-and then shut up. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
The Constitution, as Chief Justice Marshall put it in McCulloch v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
A rare few books that were written by a Justice but discovered long after he died are included in the total tally as in the case of Robert Jackson’s That Man: An Insider’s Portrait of Franklin D. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:30 am
Key Findings: Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages are proposed with the promise to improve public health outcomes, but they come with equity concerns because of their regressive nature. [read post]
