Search for: "D. Sharp v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2013, 3:35 am
Eden Alexander presents the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:35 am
Eden Alexander presents the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, United States v. [read post]
Foreign Judgments: The Limits of Transnational Issue Estoppel, Reciprocity, and Transnational Comity
26 May 2021, 8:40 pm
Written by Professor Yeo Tiong Min, SC (honoris causa), Yong Pung How Chair Professor of Law, Yong Pung How School of Law, Singapore Management University In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Merck KGaA [2021] SGCA 14, a full bench of the Singapore Court of Appeal addressed the limits of transnational issue estoppel in Singapore law, and flagged possible fundamental changes to the common law on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Singapore. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 7:16 am
In 1985, in Smith v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:22 pm
In practical terms, it's another Nokia v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:37 am
Thomas' dissent in Altria Group v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 5:52 pm
Or, ask 7 judges to interpret s. 2(d) in Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:39 am
I also thought I'd start with the most ambitious changes. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
., Lorene D. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 11:20 pm
Dodge (the John D. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:35 am
In New York Times v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:11 pm
Even apart from the First Amendment, and even assuming that Trump is implicitly saying that he’d get a cooperative Congress to change the law, he must be contemplating a sharp increase in federal authority here. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 4:10 am
That’s similar to the argument being made in State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on David Schleicher, In a Bad State: Responding to State and Local Budget Crises (Oxford University Press, 2023).David SchleicherFirst, I’d just like to thank everyone involved in this symposium. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Sharpe (1954), Williamson v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am
Nevertheless, the court, having heard submissions on the second issue from counsel (as directed by the court), decided to state its views on the matter. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:32 am
” At The World and Everything in It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
