Search for: "DANIEL JORDAN V. THE STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2017, 5:42 am by Jordan Brunner
John Bellinger commented that the Alien Tort Statute case Doe v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am by Jordan Brunner
Lisa Daniels summarized In re Search Warrant No. 16-960-M-01 to Google. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
  Lisa Daniels summarized In re Search Warrant No. 16-960-M-01 to Google. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am by Jordan Brunner
Federal Republic of Ethiopia that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act gives state-sponsored hackers immunity, while Emma Kohse discussed the history and current state of the ATS suit Salim v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by Zachary Burdette
Lisa Daniels explored the implications of the European Union’s decision to prematurely lift sanctions on an Iranian state-owned bank. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:39 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Manning’s petition, which includes a letter of support from Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg, announces her “full and complete responsibility” for her actions and describes her difficult emotional state at the time of the leak. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am by Cody M. Poplin
To meet the goal, the State Department has launched a “surge operation” in Amman, Jordan, citing a lack of personnel for the delays in processing refugee applications. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:05 pm by Ruthann Robson
Mississippi Department of Human Services (DHS), United States District Judge Daniel Jordan III found that Mississippi Code §93-17-3(5) prohibiting... [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 2:40 pm by Jeff Gittins
This proposed change was primarily in response to the Utah Supreme Court's decision in the Southam v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:40 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 6:20 am
Jordan, , 2014–Ohio–2857 (Ohio Court of Appeals 9thDistrict 2014) ¶ 40.State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
He held that the less cogent the evidence needed to satisfy the standard, (see Callaghan v Independent News & Media Limited [2008] NIQB 15 at [17] which is an aspect of the precautionary principle see Jordan’s Applications [2014] NIQB 11 at [118])([35]). [read post]