Search for: "DOES 1-28" Results 81 - 100 of 14,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am by Helen Klein
Nashiri’s Reply Brief, released on Friday, responds to the government’s contention that Nashiri’s petition does not sound in habeas at all, and is therefore barred by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:59 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Independent claims 1 and 9 of the main request, filed on 6 June 2019, read:1. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:24 am by Orin Kerr
   But at least as an exercise, consider the following eight steps. (1) Creation of the Record. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Are bad calls just "part of the game," or does baseball need appeals? [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 4:40 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Pre-registration does not include an appointment, but an interest in being vaccinated. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm by Eric Goldman
Doe No. 1 is distinguishable because the plaintiffs’ claims focused on Backpage’s posting standards. [read post]
17 May 2024, 11:44 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Matter of Furtado, 28 I&N Dec. 794 (BIA 2024) (1) A petitioner seeking approval of a Form I-130 for an adopted child from a country that is a party to the Convention on Protection of Children and Co-Operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, opened for signature May 29, 1993, S. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 3:34 pm by Jon Sands
 Defendant argues (1) that the Assimilative Crimes Act (ACA) does not apply to Indian Country. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
Both taxes are designed to raise roughly the same amount of revenue, but the surtax does so by targeting people making over $1M exclusively, while the 28% limitation could conceivably affect anyone making more than $212,300 (in 2011 - this threshold would be higher in the year when the provision actually takes effect.) [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
Both taxes are designed to raise roughly the same amount of revenue, but the surtax does so by targeting people making over $1M exclusively, while the 28% limitation could conceivably affect anyone making more thanĀ $212,300 (in 2011 - this threshold would be higher in the year when the provision actually takes effect.) [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 1:33 am
Stryker (January 28, 2008), the Federal Circuit held that claim 1 of U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 3:36 pm by CFM Admin
The California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”), which was passed as law on June 28, 2019, will be effective as of January 1, 2020. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:16 pm by WIMS
Subsequently, it conducted public meetings on June 1-2, June 13, June 28, and July 13, to gather information and discuss issues surrounding hydraulic fracturing. [read post]