Search for: "DUTY v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al" Results 81 - 100 of 155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  They provide a substantive foundation in classical American law, while also providing a first cut at teaching lawyer cultural skills. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Schachtman
Kenny, et al., Human Effects Advisory Panel, Report of Findings Sticky Shocker Assessment (1999). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Will Bland
American Commercial Lines, Inc., et al. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:29 pm by WIMS
EPA; and various intervenors including the State of Michigan, et al. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:19 pm by Jesse Dill
Charles Rose et al., out of New York state court, the employer faces claims similar to those under the FLSA but based on New York law. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
The standard is well summarized by the American Law Institute’s Principles of Corporate Governance [7]:     “A director or officer has a duty to the corporation to perform the director’s or officer’s functions in good faith, in a manner that he or she reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation, and with the care that an ordinary prudent person would reasonably be expected to exercise in a like position and under… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm by Bexis
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 285 F.3d 238, 239 n.2 (3d Cir. 2002) (applying Pennsylvania law) (Bexis’s case); Bogle v. [read post]