Search for: "Daniel W. Martin" Results 81 - 100 of 251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm by Jordan Brunner
” In The Hill, Former Obama administration principal deputy general counsel for the Department of Homeland Security Daniel Martin argues that Trump’s new travel ban is not a true national security order, but a swaggering use of a broad presidential authority. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am by Christine Corcos
In honor of International Women's Day, a list of some films that feature female lawyers and judges.A la folie, pas du tout (2002). [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
In honor of International Women's Day, a list of some films that feature female lawyers and judges.A la folie, pas du tout (2002). [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:19 am
I was happy to report the publication of Multinationals and the Constitutionalization of the World Power System (Jean-Philippe Robé, Antoine Lyon-Caen, and Stéphane Vernac, eds., Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group) 2016) ISBN: 978-1-4724-8292-1 (hbk); ISBN: 978-1-315-596334 (ebk), with a forward by John G. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016)Globalization has produced a wealth of marvelous work that seeks to theorize the emerging relationships between states, non-state actors (especially multinational corporations), and international organizations. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Daniel Bergin Case number: 13-cv-01940 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas) Case filed: May 23, 2013 Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 18, 2015 10/30/2015 1/28/2016 2015-118 SEC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  Here’s one example:[W]e conclude that a person acts in an intentional disregard of the rights of the plaintiff if the person acts with a purpose to disregard the plaintiff's rights, or is aware that his or her acts are substantially certain to result in the plaintiff's rights being disregarded. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
No serious observer or scholar of the law of evidence can deny that the lower federal courts have applied Daubert and its progeny, and the revised Federal Rule of Evidence 702, inconstantly and inconsistently, in their decisions to admit or exclude proffered expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:01 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Robins of Sullivan & Worcester on the firm’s blog, Trending Trademarks Company Pays For Taking Short Cuts to Start New Business – Martin W. [read post]