Search for: "Davis v. Jordan" Results 81 - 100 of 151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2016, 5:07 am
Davis, 561 F.3d 159 (3d Cir. 2009); Hassine v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Next week, the 110th AALS Annual Meeting starts in New York. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:42 am by Jeff Welty
Defendants Graham and Jordan committed a string of armed robberies of Baltimore businesses. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:28 am by Yishai Schwartz, Andy Wang
For support, Judge Davis relied on three Supreme Court cases: United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 3:08 pm by Brian Toth
” Judge Koh said her decision was “not at odds” with Davis, which she said, citing Judge Jordan’s concurrence, was “limited by its facts. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:00 am by Paul Caron
Brohl (10th Circuit) (Joseph Bankman (Stanford), Jordan Barry (San Diego), Barbara Fried (Stanford), Alan Morrison (George Washington), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), Kirk Stark (UCLA), John Swain (Arizona) & Dennis Ventry (UC-Davis)): This case, Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
On 18 March 2015, Nicola Davies J heard an application in the case of Lachaux v AOL Ltd. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 12:50 am by Paul Caron
Brohl (Joseph Bankman (Stanford), Jordan Barry (San Diego), Barbara Fried (Stanford), David Gamage (UC-Berkeley), Andrew Haile (Elon), Alan Morrison (George Washington), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), Kirk Stark (UCLA), John Swain (Arizona) & Dennis Ventry (UC-Davis)): The... [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am by Benjamin Bissell
As Israeli paper Yediot Achronot noted in a headline yesterday, “Jerusalem continues to burn. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 This duty of fair dealing encompasses an obligation to ensure fairness in grand jury submissions (People v Pelchat, supra; People v Jordan, 153 AD2d 263 [2nd Dept 1990]; People v Russo, 128 Misc2d 876, 880 [Co Ct Suffolk Co 1985]), which includes notice of the grand jury proceedings that gives a defendant a reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to testify, not mere technical compliance with minimum statutory notice requirements (People v… [read post]