Search for: "Davis v. Phillips" Results 81 - 100 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2013, 8:55 am by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; Martin L. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am by Kali Borkoski
” Justice Garland recalled the Court’s precedent in “NBC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
” We had a post from Angela Phillips. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 7:37 am
The event was chaired by the effervescent Rosie Burbidge stepping into the shoes of the indisposed Jeremy Phillips at short notice. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:47 am by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; David L. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:02 am by Staci Zaretsky
Welcome aboard to Kent Beattie, formerly of Slavies Davies. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:02 am by Staci Zaretsky
Welcome aboard to Kent Beattie, formerly of Slavies Davies. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Smith — Again” [Joseph Davis, Becket/Federalist Society on certiorari petition in Ricks v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 6:12 am
Topics featured in this issue include the following:* Gillian Davies, formerly of the European Patent Office and now a barrister in Hogarth Chambers, summarises significant decisions of the EPO boards of appeal in 2007;* Birgit Clark (Boult Wade Tennant) discusses the German Bundesgerichtshof COOL WATER/ICY COLD decision on the legitimacy or otherwise of allusive product names as a means of comparative advertising for imitative perfumes;* Marianne Schaffner and Sandra Georges (from… [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
  We had a summary of this by Oscar Davies: Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage focused on the decision and the 2016 presidential campaign comes from Alan Rappeport of The New York Times, Nolan McCaskill and Nick Gass of Politico,and Sarah Ferris of The Hill, while Amber Phillips of The Washington Post interviews Texas state senator Wendy Davis, who filibustered the law for eleven hours in 2013. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff's claim that had he not resigned, he may have been able to hide his fraudulent activities, [*4]continue to collect fees, and reach an agreement with OCM is purely speculative and does not raise a triable issue of fact (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434-436 [2007]; GUS Consulting Gmb, 74 AD3d at 679; Phillips-Smith Speciality Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d… [read post]