Search for: "Davis v. Strong"
Results 81 - 100
of 665
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
There is actually a disquietingly strong case at this point that Trump should be disqualified under Section 3 as a factual matter. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Never mind that ISL proponents haven’t adduced any evidence that anyone at the Founding (forget mid-19th century materials, which have no strong relevance to original public meaning in 1787) understood or discussed state legislative powers concerning federal elections to be plenary and not subject to state constitutions. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
It may be that in this regard Clibbery v Allan is now a dead letter and that Lykiardopulo was wrongly decided. [read post]
31 May 2022, 5:57 am
On May 18, 2022, the Fifth Circuit held in Jarkesy v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Perhaps the best starting point for analysis of the compelled-speech realm remains Wooley v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 12:07 pm
The Supreme Court defined peer harassment in Davis v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
Luxshare Ltd. and AlixPartners LLP v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
The one mercy of President Biden's 2022 State of the Union Address was that there was no surprises. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:34 am
The final Rule uses a definition of discriminatory "sexual harassment" that closely tracks this Court's definition of that term in Davis v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 5:58 am
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
The assurance of fairness preserved by public presence at a trial is not lost when one party's cause is pursued under a fictitious name.[8] Nonetheless, even courts that take this view acknowledge that "there remains a clear and strong First Amendment interest in ensuring that '[w]hat transpires in the courtroom is public property.'"[9] And other courts put it even more strongly: [L]awsuits are public events and the public has a legitimate interest in knowing the… [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
The recent amendments to the Divorce Act, RSC 1985, c 3 (2nd Supp) and the Supreme Court of Canada decision, Colucci v Colucci, 2021 SCC 24 suggest that lawyers are required to screen for family violence to be able to competently comply with their statutory obligations. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
Speirs found strong evidence that Scholastic had created Curly independently. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:23 pm
The film festival, hosted by news organization 100Reporters and now in its seventh year, kicked off with a screening of Sonia Kennebeck’s documentary “United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mr. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
