Search for: "Day v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 81 - 100
of 645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2011, 9:43 am
Dauphin County Commissioners, 2011 U.S. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 5:58 am
In Howard v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 10:45 am
Employees, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 9:10 am
Cir. 2008 PENDING) ATA missed its US national stage filing by one day. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 12:17 pm
If Judge Messitte's interpretation of the Domestic Emoluments Clause and its "emoluments"-language were correct, then Washington violated the clause, and his three commissioners conspired to help him do so in full light of day. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 7:05 pm
In McCarthy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:05 pm
By Michael TarrantRheaume v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:53 am
" Lefkowitz v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am
It also means that cases such as Lower Street Properties v Jones, Church Commissioners v Meya, and MacDonald v Fernandez will become much less relevant in a lot of cases. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:59 am
In Newcomb v. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 1:59 pm
Commissioner, 1 B.T.A. 236, 240 (1924); Philadelphia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:56 am
” In a statement about the meeting, EEOC Commissioner Chai R. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:20 am
v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:50 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
On 26 April 2021, Nicklin J heard the last day of the Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon trial. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
In the same way that Collins is undermined by the subequent decisions in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2016] QB 1003, [2015] EWCA Civ 311 (27 March 2015) and Case C–362/14 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (ECLI:EU:C:2015:650; CJEU, 6 October 2015), so Murphy is undermined by the subsequent decisions in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (02 October 2019) and Case… [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:36 pm
A recent tax court case, Louelia Salomon Frias, v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 2:24 pm
Would that be correct? [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
A trial court’s conclusions of law are subject to a de novo review with no presumption of correctness. [read post]
