Search for: "Deal v. Warner" Results 81 - 100 of 420
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2018, 9:27 am
  Following on from the Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (prescription by brand) Fujifilm v AbbVie [2017] EWHC 395 (Pat) (Arrow declaration) and Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 2988 (Pat) (global FRAND terms) decisions, this provides another example of the UK Patents Court providing highly specific and tailored relief appropriate to the facts of the case. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
  Over to Katie, Rachel and Claire: "Last week, the UK Supreme Court held a 4-day hearing in Warner-Lambert v Actavis et al., the latest (perhaps last?) [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:29 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Mainly dealing with my kids, spending time with friends, reading literature and travelling, when possible! [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 10:59 am by Guest Author Adonis Hoffman, Esq.
A mega merger valued at $108.7 billion, the deal seeks to marry a major content distributor (AT&T) with a leading video content producer (Time Warner). [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 10:59 am by Guest Author Adonis Hoffman, Esq.
A mega merger valued at $108.7 billion, the deal seeks to marry a major content distributor (AT&T) with a leading video content producer (Time Warner). [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:29 pm by Garrett Hinck
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck provided a primer on the merits issues in ACLU v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:19 am by Dave
Doe d Warner v Browne is the case of an alleged tenancy from year to year where the argument that a valid term of years could still be created where the landlord had agreed not to give notice failed. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
And finally the record labels and the platforms were doing deals! [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 10:48 pm by GJEL
AOL Time Warner accounting fraud $2.5 billion In 2006, a federal judge in New York approved a $2.5 billion settlement over an America Online practice of inflating advertising revenue before and after its merger with Time Warner. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:17 am by Garrett Hinck
The Supreme Court stayed the Ninth Circuit’s September 7 decision in Hawaii v. [read post]