Search for: "Department of Finance v. Commission on State Mandates"
Results 81 - 100
of 124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm
Bay Area Clean Environment, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:00 am
In Department of Finance v Commission on State Mandates,* the Court ruled in favor of public agencies subject to storm water discharge permits, holding that State-mandated storm water permit provisions exceeding federal law requirements may be reimbursable State mandates under Article XIII B, Section 6, of the California Constitution. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
California Department of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
(Indeed, the Oklahoma legislature has adopted a provision mandating the shifting of fees in derivati [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
Analysis and Suggestions: As stated in Part I, in connection with the related proposed Appendix G amendments, I believe that OPR has failed to cite sufficient legal support for mandating all projects to conduct an Appendix F energy analysis as part of required CEQA review. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Further discussion of the desirability (or otherwise) of abolishing appeals to the Privy Council arose: in 1978 in the Report of the Royal Commission on the Courts; in 1989 in a Law Commission Paper on the Structure of the Courts; in 1995 in a report by the Solicitor General to the Cabinet Strategy Committee on court structures; in a Discussion Paper called “Reshaping New Zealand’s Appeal Structure” issued in 2000 by the Attorney General; and in an Advisory Group… [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm
Department of Agriculture, 760 F.3d 18 (D.C. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
The Bransten v State of New York decisionIn September 2011 the New York State Department of Civil Service notified sitting judges that the State would reduce its contributions for health insurance premiums by 6% and reduce its contributions to retired judges' health insurance premiums by 2%. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Employers using or considering using health risk assessments or other wellness programs should carefully monitor a new Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit, EEOC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 10:20 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
Treasury Department, Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:37 pm
Indiana, North Dakota, and South Dakota have aspirational goals; the rest have mandates. [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:51 pm
Despite ACA’ amendments to HIPAA’s bona fide wellness program rules and the 11th Circuit’s rejection of an EEOC challenge in Broward County v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Sarbanes-Oxley has mandated duties of disclosure and internal controls that have transformed trade secrets into an asset that must be valued and reported. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Sarbanes-Oxley has mandated duties of disclosure and internal controls that have transformed trade secrets into an asset that must be valued and reported. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am
Federal Election Commission, much more than the decision actually holds. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 pm
Concerned about how the mandates and costs of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act will impact your corporate and family finances following the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:26 am
Department of Health and Human Services, the challenge by a group of states to the Affordable Care Act, is barred by the Tax Anti-Injunction Act even if the individual mandate provisions do not count as a tax. [read post]
