Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,421
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2023, 4:46 pm
With respect to any option given to a member under the Operating Agreement, FRED shall follow WILMA’s direction regarding her 50% interest therein (i.e. purchase of another member’s interest, sale of her interest, participation in a capital call or other options presented), to the extent allowed by the Operating Agreement. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:53 am
Similarly, insofar as Plaintiffs’ deception claims capture fake listings on other websites that direct consumers to the Roomster platform, such as Craigslist, Defendants are responsible as the creators that unlawful content. [read post]
18 May 2023, 11:12 am
Direct Sales Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:51 pm
Static Control Components, Inc., the panel noted that “a statutory cause of action extends only to plaintiffs whose interests ‘fall within the zone of interests protected by the law invoked. [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:51 pm
Static Control Components, Inc., the panel noted that “a statutory cause of action extends only to plaintiffs whose interests ‘fall within the zone of interests protected by the law invoked. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Following a period of negotiation and due diligence, in March 2022, the parties executed a purchase agreement pursuant to which Limelight would acquire Edgecast in exchange for newly issued Limelight common stock, which would result in College Parent owning 35% of Limelight’s outstanding common stock after the closing of the transaction (the “Acquisition”).[5] In connection with the Acquisition, the parties agreed on a form of stockholders’… [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
More interesting still, it was reported by the New York Times (and thereafter widely reported see, e.g. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
., the party that is best positioned to limit harm, even if they aren’t the party committing the harm. [read post]
10 May 2023, 7:48 pm
Second, Plaintiffs should not be deprived of their rights to purchase, possess, and sell constitutionally-protected arms during the years-long process that will be necessary ultimately to resolve this case. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
Given the extent of plaintiff’s ownership interest and managerial involvement in defendant corporations prior to the disputed stock surrender, the motion court properly determined that the attorney-client privilege was not properly invoked by defendants to deny plaintiff access to otherwise privileged pre-surrender materials essential to the proof of his claims”]). [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 5:53 am
The other named plaintiff, Craig Bailey, purchased shares of Acamar prior to the merger. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
Frequently, courts direct that a portion of the settlement be paid to charities or nonprofits that are supposedly aligned with class members’ interests. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm
Given that Plaintiff disputes these assertions and the parties have reached a settlement, there can be no public interest in these filings. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
Microsoft now has three attack vectors: The starting point of the analysis is whether the plaintiffs (the "gamers", though the lawyers are the real plaintiffs and now appear to be supported by Sony in whatever ways) have standing. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:33 am
“ The parties here had a clear financial arrangement designed to influence consumers to buy products from a third-party in which Defendants had a direct financial stake. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:14 am
As shareholders, Alejandro held, the plaintiffs did not suffer direct harm and therefore did hot have standing to sue. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:30 am
Make your pre-trial demands reasonable or risk losing prejudgement interest from the date of the demand. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
While an “intent to defraud” is often directed at gaining property or a pecuniary benefit, it need not be so limited. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
So, while an investor who purchases shares during the contractual lock-up period following an IPO generally knows that the purchased shares were registered under the registration statement, an investor who purchases shares following a direct listing may not know if the purchased shares were registered or unregistered. [read post]
