Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Delay" Results 81 - 100 of 138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
In the same vein the AEPD ordered that a disciplinary sanction against a prison civil servant published in the Official Gazette should be delisted from Google lest he be vulnerable to attack. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The decision also notes that Counsel for the City, in the course of oral argument, stated that the underlying disciplinary hearing was completed and that “the appointing authority, in turn, found [Rea] guilty of numerous specifications of misconduct and recommended that he be terminated from his employment. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm by nedaj
Advisers registered in other states should consult with legal counsel about those states’ custody requirements. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:50 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The school initiated an investigation and questioned Bell (with counsel and his mother present) regarding the video. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:56 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
(He complained about how long the process took, he was unprepared, and he accused the disciplinary administrator of bias.) [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm by Giles Peaker
(Finally) AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB) This High Court judgment is remarkable in many ways, most of them worrying. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
As the Court of Appeals said in Duncan v Kelly, 9 N.Y.3d 102, a probationary employee may be discharged for "almost any reason, or for no reason at all" as long as the decision is not made "in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:36 am by Joy Waltemath
Although she received a written disciplinary counseling for excessive cell phone use in September, she was rated “above average” two months later in her performance review, where it was noted that she had succeeded in keeping her personal calls to a minimum during work. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Legal Beagle
However an argument of a further breach due to delay was inconsistent with binding Inner House decisions that the relevant date was the making of a complaint to the Discipline Tribunal. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:38 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
The inference would arise that it had filed the appeal for purposes of delay, which would be an abuse of process and thus provide an additional basis for imposition of sanctions under Fed.R.App.P. 38 (“damages for delay”)”). [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:20 pm by PaulKostro
To determine “whether the moving party has waived its right to object to the opposing party’s counsel, consideration must be given to: (1) the length of the delay in bringing the motion to disqualify; (2) when the movant learned of the conflict; (3) whether the movant was represented by counsel during the delay; (4) why the delay occurred; and (5) whether disqualification would result in prejudice to the non-moving party. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Charon QC
  Legal Cheek reports: “As Richard Todd QC put it while defending Mostyn at his May Bar Standards Board (BSB) disciplinary hearing: “The caution [given by the police to Mostyn when he was caught with the drugs] itself has an impact – it will have a bearing on future applications, whether for [crown court] recorder or Queen’s Counsel. [read post]