Search for: "District of Columbia v. Thompson" Results 81 - 100 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
District of Columbia – Prosecutors Say DC Mayor Knew of Illegal ‘Shadow Campaign,’ Personally Requested Funds Star Tribune – Ben Nuckols (Associated Press) | Published: 3/10/2014 Prosecutors said District of Columbia Mayor Vincent Gray knew about an illegal fundraising operation that helped him capture the 2010 election and personally asked a prominent business executive to finance the scheme. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:00 am by jonathanturley
Trump lost the 2020 presidential vote in the District of Columbia, receiving a mere 5.4% of the vote. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
  Applying Jackson, a federal district court concluded that “Arkansas has not adopted alternative or market share liability,” in Fields v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
We blogged about the problems with Guinan here.District of ColumbiaThe very first court to permit medical monitoring absent actual injury was a federal "prediction" of District of Columbia law. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 31 January 2013 there is a pre-trial review in the case of Thompson v James. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
Pharmaceutical cases that warrant federal court multi-district litigation (MDL) treatment typically involve complex scientific and statistical issues. [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction A Brief Overview of GILTI Calculating GILTI Tax Liability State Taxation of GILTI Is Complex and Uncompetitive State Taxation of GILTI Raises Constitutional Issues Current Status of States’ Taxation of GILTI The Impact on States of the Biden Administration’s Proposed Federal Changes to GILTI A Brief Overview of FDII Current State Treatment of the FDII Deduction and the Impact of the Biden Administration’s Proposed Changes Recent… [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
District Court for the District of Columbia for “a necessary second level of judicial permission to begin combing through the records. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  LGBT Obligations for Private Employers Vary By State  Seventeen states and the District of Columbia have laws expressly banning discrimination in private employment based upon sexual orientation and gender identity: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. [read post]