Search for: "Doe v. Regents of the University of California"
Results 81 - 100
of 317
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2021, 2:36 pm
” In re Regents of University of California, 101 F.3d 1386, 1389 (Fed. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 2:39 pm
Regents of the University of California, 167-177 Notes, 177-178 [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
The Regents of the University of California (2020) 51 Cal.App.5th 226, and my 7/2/20 post on it can be found here. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] Millennium Rock Mortg., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
Regents of the University of California, et al. agreeing with some federal courts that the reasoning given for DACA’s rescission was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
Regents of the University of California, et al. agreeing with some federal courts that the reasoning given for DACA’s rescission was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:03 pm
Regents of the University of California While this is not strictly an employment law case, it will have a big impact on employment. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Regents of the University of California, the Court this term rejected the government’s attempt to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Regents of University of California, rejecting the Trump Administration’s attempt to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 2:15 pm
Bank v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
The Regents of the University of California, et al. (2020) ___ Cal.App.5th ___.) [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:28 pm
Regents of the University of California blocking the government from terminating the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program (i.e., “DACA”). [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am
Regents of the University of California, in which the court held that the government’s decision to terminate the DACA program violated the procedural requirements prescribed for administrative agencies, along with her dissents in other cases involving “discrimination at the hands of government actors,” “exposes the Roberts Court as unwilling to understand or accept how minority communities are actually discriminated against today. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 7:36 am
Regents of the University of California, Professor Christopher Walker notes a potential implication of the Court's refusal to consider the justifications for the Trump Administration's actions offered in the Nielsen memo. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:34 pm
Regents of the University of California, Trump v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 7:56 am
Regents of the University of California—the DACA case. [read post]
