Search for: "Does 1-141" Results 81 - 100 of 992
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm by Francis Pileggi
Key Issues Addressed:  (1)  Whether DGCL Section 141(b) is a permissive statute that does not require a director to resign in writing; and (2) Whether the Court of Chancery abused its discretion by denying Oracle an award of attorneys’ fees even though Oracle never made the argument seeking the fee award in its trial briefs or post-trial arguments. [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Policy considerationThe policy underpinning s.55(1) is to respect private intellectual property rights, and a narrow interpretation of s.55(1) supports this ([164]).VII. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 11:00 pm by Aparna Chandra
This also raises other issues. 1)On what basis do judges decide whether a case should be reportable or not? [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Under Section 141(c)(2), a committee does not have any power with respect to approving an agreement of merger or its terms. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 1:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As astonishing an observation as this is, a settlement that does not exceed $185 million will not even make the Top 100 list. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 2:46 am by Andrew Trask
* How limited does a fund have to be to qualify under Rule 23(b)(1)(B)? [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:23 pm
The will, dated August 1, 1960, was admitted to probate on January 24, 1961. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Leggett”) of noninfringement of claims 1-5 of U.S. [read post]