Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
United States, 425 U.S. at 394–95, 96 S. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Borak,[1] however, the Supreme Court implied a private right of action from the statute. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:06 am
This 96-page agreement includes seven major chapters which cover the following matters respectively: (1) intellectual property, (2) technology transfer, (3) trade in food and agricultural products, (4) financial services, (5) macroeconomic policies and exchange rate matters and transparency, (6) trade expansion, and (7) dispute resolution. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:14 pm
§§ 733.609(1), 733.901(1)-(2). [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:19 pm
(I wrote a Slaw post about the amendment relating to Bill 96, adding two new provisions to section 90 of the Constitution Act, 1867.) [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Which does not mean that they necessarily commit a substantial procedural violation when doing so.Inventive step[1] The Examining Division (ED) based its reasoning on the disclosure of, inter alia, document D4. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
Thus, the law allows a person who does well on G.S. 90-96 probation to keep his or her record clean. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:52 am
Does this make sense? [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
Melissa Beeson, d/b/a Spoon Tracker, Opposition No. 91221098 and 91222928 (July 28, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw).If a proposed mark does not function as a mark to identify and distinguish an applicant's services, then a refusal to register under Sections 1, 2, and 45 of the Trademark Act is appropriate. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 12:35 pm
" What does that mean? [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:54 pm
Cheryl got about $96 million under the Federal Whistleblower Act, which goes back to the Civil War era.Other details from MarketWatch:In August 2002, Ms. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:57 am
GS 58-62-96) 2. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
G 1/05 [11.1] and T 600/08 [2.3]. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 11:01 am
This point is well summarised in T 1028/96 [2] on which the petitioner relies: "However, even if it is not expressly stated in A 24(3), the EPC requires, as a general rule, that objections be reasoned, i.e. indicates facts and arguments which are alleged to support such objection. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:31 am
Allowability of the objection2.1 Legal basis of the objection2.1.1 The appellant has not argued that there was any reason for exclusion under Article 24(1) EPC, nor does the present board see any basis for the application of Article 24(1) EPC either. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
However, the cited evidence does not have to be filed within the TFO; according to the established case law, it can still be filed at a later time (see e.g. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 12:17 pm
Goldsmith today at 1-800-773-8622 to schedule a free and confidential consultation. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:59 am
[commentary in the original] Although s. 96 of the Constitution Act does not explicitly mention this role, this understanding can be found at para 58 of Dunsmuir, which itself was gleaned from Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
During this conversation the drawing referred to as D8 (drawing EKM-Ps-96/08 with handwritten remarks) was used as a basis for the discussions with Seondo. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
R 13(1) EPC 1973 was streamlined and its wording aligned with the revised EPC. [read post]
