Search for: "Does 2 to 20" Results 81 - 100 of 25,371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2021, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Below are the headings of the top 20 NYPPL items accessed during the weekend ending May 16, 2021. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Below are the headings of the top 20 NYPPL items accessed during the weekend ending May 16, 2021. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 4:53 am by Texas Legal News
Just before 2:30 a.m., on October 25, the Dallas Police Department responded to the scene of a motor vehicle accident on Interstate 20. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:35 pm by LTA-Editor
Eolas Patent, Fig. 2 Jeff Patterson Managing Operations Editor   On February 8, 2012, an eight-member federal jury, comprised of laypersons from the Eastern District of Texas, invalidated two internet patents. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 12:28 pm by Chad Marriott
On October 20, my colleague Janet Jacobs reported that the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 8:34 am
Does the president really think it wise to eliminate tax provisions that encourage investment in technology and exploration and development and would likely constrict future energy supplies, raise energy costs and kill jobs? [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
HB 20 defines neither “impeding” nor “transmission,” but it is hard to imagine an interpretation that doesn’t conflict with the protections granted to these service providers by Section 230(c)(2)(A) and 230(c)(2)(B). [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am by Maureen Johnston
Marion County Election Board, the evidentiary record establishes that the law substantially burdens the voting rights of hundreds of thousands of the state’s voters, and that the law does not advance a legitimate state interest; and (2) whether a state’s voter ID law violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act where the law disproportionately burdens and abridges the voting rights of African-American and Latino voters compared to White voters. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 4:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As such, we do notsustain the rejection of claim 5.In re Bond is cited:Such adistinction does not persuasively demonstrate the finding is in error becausethe nomenclature is not controlling. [read post]