Search for: "Dolan v. Land"
Results 81 - 100
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 7:24 am
"The government's demand for property from a land use permit applicant must satisfy the Nolan and Dolan requirements even when it denies the permit." 5-4 in the most predictable 5-4 pattern. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 1:40 pm
California Coastal Commission, in 1987, and Scalia was part of a five-Justice majority in the 1994 case of Dolan v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:46 pm
” In 1994, in Dolan v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 12:11 am
Here are two more amicus curiae briefs in n Koontz v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 12:01 am
Here they are, more amicus curiae briefs in n Koontz v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 11:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 12:01 am
Petitioner's Brief on the Merits, Koontz v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 6:26 am
The Court has taken up the question of whether the Nollan/Dolan nexus-proportionality tests apply to government demands for cash, as well as land exactions. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 11:45 am
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), and Dolan v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:37 pm
Florida land use and environmental law attorney Jake Cremer has posted the Brief in Opposition in Koontz v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
The Importance of Koontz v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:26 am
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), and Dolan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
Pataki, 165 F.Supp. 2d 266, 300 (N.D.N.Y. 2001) (testimony on state’s purchase of tribal land); Denson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Coastal Com., 483 U.S. 825 (1987); Dolan v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:54 am
West Linn Corporate Park LLC v City of West Linn, No. 11-299 (petition for cert. filed Sep. 6, 2011), a petition we've been following that asked whether the nexus and "rough proportionality" tests for a regulatory taking in Nollan and Dolan are limited to government demands for land, has been denied. [read post]
