Search for: "Don Jackson"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,283
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In any event, SKJ don't mention either of these alternatives.SKJ do describe one specific alternative means of enforcing Section 3 that they think the per curiam unnecessarily eliminates. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 8:46 am
Discussions of the Constitution's and Section 3's "office"- and "officer"-language led to probing questioning by Justices Jackson and Gorsuch during oral argument. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:45 am
Justice Jackson would have denied the petition because of her views about when lower court decisions should be vacated based on mootness. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:26 am
Accessed February 25, 2024. https://supremecourthistory.org/supreme-court-justices/associate-justice-ketanji-brown-jackson/ [2] “Ketanji Brown Jackson,” Oyez. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:04 am
Don’t Even Think About PPC. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson queried: “Don’t you have to say something? [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:30 am
How often do we encounter employees who don’t know the value or purpose of their work? [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
Yet Josh celebrated Gorsuch & Jackson taking it seriously. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
National/Federal The Quiet Way Democrats Hope to Expand Their Power at the State Level DNyuz – Nick Corasaniti (New York Times) | Published: 2/20/2024 Locked out of power on the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 9:38 am
To his possible credit, however, that was perhaps his point: I generally don't care, but even I cared about this one. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm
Jackson made her point even more clearly a few minutes later, telling Sridharan that “what I’m a little concerned about is that really your argument is just boiling down to we think we have a meritorious claim and we don’t want to have to follow the law while we’re challenging it. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:09 pm
WEIR: We don't think so. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:12 am
I haven’t been the same since and I don’t think this feeling I have will ever change. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
I don't think there is a good rationale. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
And why don't all of those things make a difference in our thinking about this qualification as opposed to any other? [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
I don’t expect others to agree, but the real significance of Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Maybe, just maybe, Justice Jackson will be an exception to that rule. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
”It is, as the APA puts it, “so ingrained in our culture that we often don’t even notice. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Justice Jackson, for example, emphasized the difference between the language in Section 11 of the Securities Act and the language in Rule 10b-5, opining: “When you’re required to state something and you don’t state it, Section 11 says there’s liability. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:58 am
I don't know if this remand is even possible, or if the rules even permit it, but it sounds like the sort of blue plate special the Chief could whip up. [read post]
