Search for: "E C
v.
State of Indiana"
Results 81 - 100
of 368
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2018, 4:20 am
” At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Ilya Somin writes that “[e]ven if the justices punt on the excessiveness issue, a ruling that incorporates the Excessive Fines Clause against the states and holds that the Clause applies to at least some substantial number of civil asset forfeitures would be an important victory for civil liberties and property rights. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:32 pm
Appeal from the Fulton Superior Court, Trial Court Cause No. 25D01-1601-CC-50 The Honorable Wayne E. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Wynder & Geoffrey C. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
Namely, (a) the aroused emotional state the dog is in during an attack; (b) the strong desire to find a person to attack; (c) the bite and hold training the dog has received; (d) poor selection of the dog at the time of purchase, and (e) an inexperienced or poorly supervised dog/handler team. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:55 pm
On Friday, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) reversed the abatement in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am
B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
C. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm
Validity – Obviousness: B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
” For the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Margot E. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
If that seems as familiar as Indiana Jones 4, that very question is already before the court in a number of serial relists: Allen v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
C. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
Opposing counsel: Leonard C. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court Is Likely to Uphold State Powers in Some Way The pending South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
Thus, other states—including Indiana (Ind. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
The topic had already been subject to nearly 20 references to the CJEU for preliminary rulings, and yes, there would be more from the court in 2017 as the decisions in Filmspeler, C-527/15, and Ziggo, C-601/15 (The Pirate Bay) loomed! [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
Kamara stating “[e]ven if withdrawal is otherwise appropriate, other considerations must sometimes take precedence[,]” and asked her opinion as that relates to Model Rules 1.16(a) and 3.4(c). [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Duke and State of New York v. [read post]
