Search for: "E. H. Sales, Inc. v. the United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2016, 1:44 pm
According to Han Beauty Inc v Alberto-Culver Co., 236 F.3d 1333, (Fed. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:24 am
’s opinion announcement in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm
” In last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
Rev. 433 (2012); H. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:46 am
Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
Messer and Fong were once employed by SunPower as Area Sales Manager and Senior Director of Global Brand, respectively. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Also in the US, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that watchmaker Omega's attempt to use copyright laws to block the sale of Omega watches at discounted prices by Costco will just not work - because of the 'first sale' doctrine' - and that Omega's action was also a misuse of copyright. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
Subaru of America Inc. is represented by Stanley H. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
See Grace United Methodist Church v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:24 am
By 2008, e-commerce sales alone totaled $3.16 trillion per year in the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:18 pm
, Limelight Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 819 F. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
”[37] With respect to the first two mailings promoting the sale of products, the Court held that these easily fell “within the core notion of commercial speech—speech which does no more than [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
AVENTURA TENNIS, LLC, INC., Appellee. 3rd District.Injury LawAdams, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
State of California (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1542. [read post]
