Search for: "E.G. v Medical Express Corp." Results 81 - 100 of 199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Vercammen Law
During oral argument, plaintiff's attorney confirmed that no statutory or regulatory violation had been or could be asserted, that plaintiff had only a medical negligence claim for the alleged treatment Burns received at Care One, and that he anticipated his experts may refer to a breach of statutes or regulations as evidence of the applicable standard of care. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 530 East 89 Corp. v Unger, 43 NY2d 776, 777 (1977) (internal citations omitted). [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm by MOTP
Prior to seeking a decision on the merits, One Technologies had obtained a case transfer to Texas for the express purpose of having the arbitration take place in Texas. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
App’x 854, 857–58 (5th Cir. 2010) (expressing “disapproval of the [immigration judge]’s reliance on Wikipedia and [warning] against any improper reliance on it or similarly unreliable internet sources in the future”), Badasa v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:36 am by John Day
· “Broadly speaking, the aim of the civil discovery process is ‘to bring out the facts prior to trial so the parties will be better equipped to decide what is actually at issue,’ see, e.g., Ingram v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm by Schachtman
See, e.g., Lituanian Commerce Corp., Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Siemens Medical Solutions v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  C2R’s advertisements claimed that the Rx Destroyer “destroys” and “[d]issolves, adsorbs, and neutralizes” medications. [read post]