Search for: "E.R. V. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  As to them, however, we adhere to our general rule that we don’t do the other side’s research for them.AlabamaThe Alabama Supreme Court held, in E.R. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 4:31 pm
College of Wales v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm by David Cheifetz
Wardlaw, [1956] 1 All E.R. 615 (H.L.); McGhee v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am by Schachtman
Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd., [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 3 All E.R. 385 (holding that copying does not invalidate a court’s decision); id. at para. 41 (citing United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm by familoo
As a consequence, Munby J’s decision in Mubarak v Mubarak (No.1) [2001] 1 F.L.R. 673 has been overruled and W v H (Family Division: Without Notice Orders) [2001] 1 All E.R. 300 is overruled in part. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:01 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Baron Cawley, [1975] 3 All E.R. 625 (H.L.), Lord Wilberforce states: “…I do not doubt that conceptions of public policy should move with the times…”. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Also, on another hot topic, Wayne D’Angelo has a nice summary of hydraulic fracturing developments in various states. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:48 am by Rosalind English
Transpetrol v Slovakia, Application no. 28502/08 - read judgment The facts of this case can be stated very briefly, since the main (and most interesting) question before the Curt was whether the applicant company constituted a “victim” of a human rights violation under the Convention. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:44 pm
National Insurance Commissioner, ex parte Connor, [1981] 1 All E.R. 769 (Div. [read post]