Search for: "EASTMAN KODAK CO." Results 81 - 100 of 144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2012, 9:07 pm by Bala Krishnan
, Ltd. 08/12/2009 5:09-cv-00114 pending   Eastman Kodak Company 02/20/2009 3:09-cv-00344 pending   Eastman Kodak Company 02/20/2009 3:09-cv-00343 pending   Hitachi, Ltd. 11/26/2008 3:08-cv-01139 closed ASKO Appliances, Inc. 11/05/2008 1:08-cv-00828 pending   Petters Group Worldwide,LLC 09/19/2008 5:08-cv-00163 pending   Quanta Computer, Inc. … [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants’ alleged assurance that her case would not go to trial is at odds with the clear language of the first retainer and, at most, represents a promise about the future (see Eastman Kodak Co. v Roopak Enters., 202 AD2d 220, 222 [1st Dept 1994]) — which in any event [*2]was kept. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:08 am by Epstein Becker Green
Eastman Kodak Co., no. 06-cv-6489 (W.D.N.Y. 2006), included the following language: Except as described below, you agree and covenant not to file any suit, charge or complaint against Releasees in any court or administrative agency, with regard to any claim, demand, liability or obligation arising out of your employment with Kodak or separation therefrom. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:05 am
In addition, the court pointed out that in Matter v Eastman Kodak Co., 104 F.3d 702, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals said that threats of termination, reprimands, hostility from fellow employees, and being placed on warning were not “ultimate employment decisions” and thus not “adverse employment actions. [read post]
17 May 2010, 11:57 am by Eric Schweibenz
., Apple Inc. and Eastman Kodak Co.) significant investment in plant and equipment, capital and labor, and research and development with respect to the patents-in-suit. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:04 pm by Dennis Hursh
In 1973, Eastman Kodak held a seemingly impregnable position in the lucrative market for photo film and chemicals, enjoyed a reputation for innovation and astute marketing, and boasted a market value even greater than oil giant Exxon. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:39 pm
Dismissal of a rival cloud service’s claims, which were asserted as counterclaims to the software company’s suit alleging theft of certain proprietary information from its password-protected website, was therefore denied.TyingAn argument by the software company that no tie existed because customers were not required to use any cloud computing service at all in conjunction with the accounting software was rejected under the precedent established in Eastman Kodak… [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 10:28 pm
Eastman Kodak Co.4 and In re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation, that have been particularly controversial.5 The agencies examine the diverging analyses in these decisions and note that hearing panelists agreed that neither decision provides “sufficient guidance on potential antitrust liability for a refusal to license. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 2:58 pm by Jeffrey May
On April 21, a group of antitrust professors filed an amicus brief, supporting the petitioner and asking the Court to address whether the Rule 56 standard of Eastman Kodak Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 8:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Eastman Kodak Co., 657 F.3d 1349, 1356–57 (Fed.Cir. 2011) (quoting Fairchild Republic Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Eastman Kodak Co., 789 F.2d 1556, 1559 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 1:43 am by Florian Mueller
Apple is fighting a strategic battle at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:00 am by Chelsey Russell
Tyson has provided economic and policy expertise to the Morgan Stanley Board since 1997 and also sits on the Board of Directors at AT&T Inc., CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. and Eastman Kodak Company. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Way back in May, I cracked wise about the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) fictional “Bureau of Let’s Sue Meta,” noting that the commission’s proposal (really, an “order to show cause”) to modify its 2020 settlement of a consumer-protection matter with what had then been Facebook—in other words, a settlement modifying a 2012 settlement—was the FTC’s third enforcement action with Meta in the first half of 2023. [read post]