Search for: "Edmunds v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2015, 11:06 am by Dan Ernst
Here is Professor Ricci’s review.]During the 1968 presidential campaign, Richard Nixon pledged that if elected president, he would appoint “law and order” justices to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:21 am by Ruthann Robson
Johnson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan Nancy Edmunds has concluded there is... [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:40 am by Mark Murakami
Today marks the 40th anniversary of the sinking of the M/V Edmund Fitzgerald on Lake Superior in 1975. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:45 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
United States: The Right of the United States Citizens of Puerto Rico to Vote for the President and the Need to Re-evaluate America’s Territorial Policy. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:13 pm
And the worst part is that the only umpires for this impending conflict will be: you guessed it -- unelected lawyers in black robes.What may come as news to some is that the United States has been there before -- and the results were not pretty.Start with a church's tax-exempt status: it can be removed for teaching and holding principles that are contrary to federal law, as happened in the 1983 case of Bob Jones University v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Maple Drive Farms v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:26 am by Jani
In the United States, under various State legislation, an individual's personality or persona can be protected; something that isn't protectable per say under UK legislation.Some faces are just made for t-shirtsNevertheless, the protection offered under passing off can potentially extend to individuals, at least on a prima facie application of the requisite elements: there has to be goodwill associated with that individual; a misrepresentation as to that goodwill… [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm by Marta Requejo
They reiterate that for a case to be given jurisdiction by ATS it must a) touch and concern the United States with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritoriality and: b) demonstrate that the conduct, prima facie, breaches a law of nations or treaty of the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Christine Fair, an assistant professor at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
Unless it is treated as surplusage, this second clause indicates that the Constitution vests powers in the Government of the United States that are not merely identical or coextensive with the powers vested in Congress or other Departments or Officers of the United States. [read post]