Search for: "Empire v. Commercial" Results 81 - 100 of 749
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am by Eric Goldman
TikTok * So Many Unanswered Empirical Questions About FOSTA * Another Problematic FOSTA Ruling–Doe v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
Last year we reported on the case of Goldstein v Pataki, 516 F3d 50 [2008] involving the proposed condemnation of property in Brooklyn, New York in order to build the so called Atlantic Yards Project which includes a huge residential and commercial development along with an arena for the New Jersey Nets. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
Last year we reported on the case of Goldstein v Pataki, 516 F3d 50 [2008] involving the proposed condemnation of property in Brooklyn, New York in order to build the so called Atlantic Yards Project which includes a huge residential and commercial development along with an arena for the New Jersey Nets. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:38 am by Eric Goldman
Feb. 28, 2022) More SESTA/FOSTA-Related Posts * So Many Unanswered Empirical Questions About FOSTA * Another Problematic FOSTA Ruling–Doe v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:19 am by Unknown
Commercial speech, Native American imagery and cultural sovereignty. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Terry Hart
”3 Instead, said the court, “We think it best to stick with the statutory list…” Commerciality Another dramatic turn in fair use doctrine is seen in the treatment of “commerciality” in the first factor. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 11:28 pm by Stanford Law Review
Epstein 455 NOTE An Empirical Analysis of Section 1983 Qualified Immunity Actions and Implications of Pearson v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:40 pm
A Daubert motion is the outcome of a 1993 Supreme Court case, Daubert v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am by Eric Goldman
Worse for Comphy, the court characterizes the Comphy word mark as descriptive and not commercially strong because the word mark isn’t heavily advertised to consumers. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:07 am by Terry Hart
— Eminent copyright scholar Jane Ginsburg on the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Authors Guild v. [read post]