Search for: "England v. Cir*" Results 81 - 100 of 2,589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am by CMS
For example, ‘authorities in England are subject to a specific duty to provide accommodation for children in need’[11] and they also have a general duty ‘to safeguard and promote the welfare of children within their area who are in need; and so far as is consistent with that duty, to promote the upbringing of such children by their families. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am by Frank Cranmer
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am by John Coyle
This post is by Carlos Manuel Vázquez, a professor of law at Georgetown Law School. [read post]
  This was the case in R v Rogers [2014] EWCA Crim 1680, where there was no act of money laundering in England but it was sufficient that the underlying fraud generating the criminal property took place in England and there were English victims. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm by Frank Cranmer
Philip Jones, Ecclesiastical Law: Cathedral Cities: England and Wales. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 7:41 am by Dan Bressler
In PACCAR Inc & Ors v Competition Appeal Tribunal & Ors, four out of five justices ruled that such agreements fall within the statutory definition of damages-based agreements (DBAs). [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am by David Pocklington
Alleged judicial Islamophobia was an issue in Farid el Diwany v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 888. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Last month, the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit held a reenactment of the argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am by INFORRM
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 11:52 pm by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Harriet Gray, Lexology: Balancing beliefs in the workplace: lessons from Higgs v. [read post]