Search for: "English v. Stevens" Results 81 - 100 of 385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm) H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm), also demonstrates potentially important differences between New York and English law. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am by Lorelie S. Masters
H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm) H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm), also demonstrates potentially important differences between New York and English law. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:06 am by David Markus
S. 470, 479 (1971) (Harlan, J., plurality opinion).Justice Stevens (in his dissent in Renico v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:06 am by David Markus
S. 470, 479 (1971) (Harlan, J., plurality opinion).Justice Stevens (in his dissent in Renico v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:30 am by David Whitehead
Mr Knowles began by explaining that the form of joint enterprise in question, Parasitic Accessorial Liability or “PAL”, was a distinct form of liability established by two cases, Chan Wing Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168 and R v Powell and English [1999] 1 AC 1. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am by Brian Cordery
At first instance, Arnold J followed two first instance English Court decisions which suggest that the transfer of equitable title is sufficient (KCI v Smith & Nephew [2010] and HTC v Gemalto [2013]). [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:00 pm
v=GyzcxO9idyQPhoto Credit: Brown Harris StevensYouTube Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991 backtothemovies.com/Source: TopTenRealEstateDeals.com [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
  In Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
Robert Sharp, also of English PEN, has dissected some of the detail here and here. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The ‘bipolar’ model In English law – though not only in English law – the arch-dominant model on which tort law is built is to contrast wrong and loss. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
First up is Montgomery v. [read post]
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:29 am
Stevens felt compelled to reference the page containing the word "the" in the Oxford English Dictionary. [read post]