Search for: "Even v. Clifford"
Results 81 - 100
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2016, 7:16 am
Clifford Brown-- we just enjoy both while acknowledging that they each embody greatness of different sorts.All that said, Paul Simon is an interesting case, I think, because his output is so even. [read post]
20 May 2016, 11:01 am
Admittedly, such a program might well be permissible under existing Supreme Court precedent, most notably the Supreme Court’s 1916 decision in Butler v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm
There is a judgment on liability and quantum (Burrell v Clifford [2016] EWHC 294 (Ch)), although Mr Justice Mann’s earlier decision dismissing Mr Clifford’s strike out application on limitation and triviality grounds (Burrell v Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch)) is arguably of wider importance. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:03 pm
Fortas received, as Johnson puts it, “a final indignity” in not even reaching fifty votes. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm
Last week saw a trial which brought together two names very well known to media lawyers in the past, Burrell v Clifford. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:42 am
Hoskins v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
Therefore, it was not obvious to test pregabalin – it might be obvious to test gabapentin, but even here the judge considered that the skilled team would have little expectation of success.InsufficiencyAccording to the caselaw relating to sufficiency developed in MedImmune Ltd v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 1699 (Pat) at [458]-[484] and summarised in Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v Kennametal UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 3311 (Pat) at… [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE * Never too late 64 - [week ending on Sunday 20 September] – Adwords in Canada | EU Draft consultation on ISPs | "The UPC: A Panel Debate" | Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music | CJEU in KitKat | Paul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch) | Economics of Collecting Societies |… [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
It wasn’t until 1987 that Clifford Turner and Coward Chance merged, for example, and in 2004, when Slaughter and May celebrated its 125th anniversary, most of the people who had ever been partners were still alive. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
McCullock v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm
On the same day Mann J handed down judgment in the case of Burrell v Clifford. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:15 am
But this "makes CloudFlare and other Internet Service Providers the copyright and trademark police for other rights holders" according to the company's general counsel, Kenneth Carter and CloudFlare, which does not host websites or register domain names, had said in court papers filed on May 28th that its services were passive and automatic, and that even without CloudFlare, the new Grooveshark would be able to continue (Arista Records LLC et al v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:21 pm
A magistrate judge in Scott v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:12 am
” Mississippi University for Women v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 11:41 am
Swirsky v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 4:36 am
[An example of this is the well-known case brought by the Chiffons in relation to George Harrison’s My Sweet Lord, where George Harrison was found guilty of ‘subconscious plagiarism’ – see Bright Tunes Music v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
by Dennis Crouch In Teva v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Defendant Ordered to Produce Archived Emails Even Though Plaintiff Failed to Produce Theirs: In Finjan, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
Since the Justices’ ruling in 2008 in District of Columbia v. [read post]
