Search for: "Farley v. Doe" Results 81 - 100 of 138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
See also the recent Australian case of Mickle v Farley [2013] NSWDC 295 (Farley, a student, was ordered to pay Mickle, his teacher, A$105,000 in damages for tweets sent to his followers), and have been subject to disciplinary proceedings, and in some cases, dismissal by their employer. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
The mere coincidence in time does not make the two wounds a single harm, or the conduct of the two defendants one tort. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Farley: what is the worst case scenario? [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  For his project, compare Christine Haight Farley on the inter-American treaties where American companies were apparently doing the same thing.) [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of LawSleeping Treaty: The Pan-American Trademark ConventionTTAB’s 2000 Belmont case: British-American Tobacco v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The recent decision of Justice Fuerst in R v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:57 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Over at the Lawyers, Guns, and Money blog, Robert Farley has an interesting post taking me to task for ignoring the siege of Harfleur in my discussion of Henry V and the law of armed conflict. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Farley: why is it a higher burden on P? [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  What does it mean for something to be unfair? [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: Christine Haight Farley’s paper says a bunch about this. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 10:46 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
That order obviously does not finally decide the substantive issue affecting the appellant and the respondent Cavell, because it does not approve the scheme of arrangement. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
"Lochnerians" is a reference to the much-maligned 1905 case of Lochner v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
TM doctrine does have the doctrine of ornamentality. [read post]