Search for: "Federal Cartridge Company" Results 81 - 100 of 186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Lexmark International, Inc., a case that tests the scope of the patent-exhaustion doctrine, noting that if “printer maker Lexmark International prevails against ink cartridge reseller Impression Products, tech giants and other American companies will gain the ability to control products through patent claims after they have been sold. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 12:26 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
Lexmark International Inc., printer company Lexmark sold printer cartridges with restrictions on refilling and resale. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
 Over at PATENTLYO, Dennis Crouch blogs about the non-precedential decision In re Chudik, issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which involved whether a functional limitation contained in a claim can be found in the prior art. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 10:06 am by Cory Doctorow
When security researchers have to sue the federal government for the right to do their jobs, HP needs to tell us where they stand on this issue. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:54 am by Edgar (aka MrConsumer)
Last week, we told you about a nasty ploy by Hewlett Packard to disable non-HP ink cartridges in certain inkjet printers. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm by Michael Grossman
The gas pressure produced at the moment of firing can rupture the not-fully-supported cartridge case. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 6:45 am by Jonathan Bailey
Examples of this include a flame war over home births that spilled into federal court over an ill-conceived copyright notice and YouTuber TotalBiscuit had a video removed from YouTube because the game company did not like his review and, of course, the Dentist from above. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:20 am by Lyle Denniston
  The board’s action was illegal because the case was initiated by an “acting” general counsel whom the president did not have the power to appoint, the company contended. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:10 am by Moll Law Group, Ltd
The rifle’s safety mechanism was off, there was a spent cartridge casing in the chamber of the rifle, and there was a rope attached to the rifle. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:34 pm by Gregory Winsky
The lower court: (a) found no infringement on the domestic sales of Return Program Cartridges (even though the Federal Circuit had held in its 1992 decision in Mallinckrodt v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:53 am by Dennis Crouch
 The problem though is that Impression is a rather small generic-cartridge company and lacks the funds to hire a top Supreme Court counsel – perhaps especially important here because of the 200 years of Supreme Court precedent relating to the issues at hand. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 1:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Companies holding patent rights in certainamplifiers (AT&T, Western Electric, RCA) licensed theAmerican Transformer Company to make and sell amplifiers.The Transformer Company “was a mere licenseeunder a nonexclusive license, amounting to no more than‘a mere waiver of the right to sue. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:11 am by Jason Rantanen
Developing-world consumers and pharmaceutical companies would both be better off if the Federal Circuit sticks with its Jazz Photo rule. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 9:58 am by Steven M. Taber
 FAA enforcement actions, as with all federal agency enforcement actions, require attention from personnel that are experienced in these matters. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Ernst, Of Printer Cartridges and Patent Exhaustion: The En Banc Federal Circuit is Poised to Clarify Quanta. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:59 am by LTA-Editor
Lexmark offers the same cartridges through two separate programs: “Regular Program” cartridges at full price and “Return Program” cartridges at a discount. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Impression, the Federal Circuit is holding an en banc hearing to consider the impact of both Kirtsaeng and Quanta on issues of patent exhaustion. [read post]