Search for: "Fernandez v. Ins*" Results 81 - 100 of 372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2018, 12:42 pm
  So Daniels Sharpsmart gets a ton -- actually, 320,000 pounds -- of California-created medical waste, and instead of burning it, ships it to Kentucky and Indiana, which (perhaps not surprisingly) allow medical waste to be dealt with in a much more lenient matter.California tries to stop this scheme, but Daniels Sharpsmart sues, saying that California's attempt to regulate medical waste generated in California violates the Constitution; in particular, the dormant Commerce… [read post]
3 May 2011, 5:28 am by Ted Folkman
According to a New York appellate decision, Fernandez v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 10:53 am
  Not Judge Fernandez.Judge Fernandez's doppelganger is Judge John Kane. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Citing two decisions by the Supreme Court, Delaware State College v Ricks, 449 U.S. 25 and Chardon v Fernandez, 454 U.S. 6, the Second Circuit held that plaintiff's notice of termination in this case may, itself, constitute an adverse employment action notwithstanding its revocation before it became effective for the purpose of litigating an alleged unlawful discrimination or other claim.Although in this action the court found that the rescission of a notice of… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:25 pm
  The third is Milovanovic -- the latest installment in the avalanche of recent "honest services" cases -- in which Judge Fernandez dissents to an opinion by Judge Kleinfeld joined by Judge Clifton.Feel the love. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 6:54 am
Just sit back and relax, as we review the case of Fernandez v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:58 pm by Michael Froomkin
I’ve also decided that I will not be voting for Ariel Fernandez (see Ariel Fernandez – a Grass Roots Candidate With a Past). [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, said the court, where the language in the collective bargaining agreement "is 'reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation, extrinsic or parol evidence may be then permitted to determine the parties' intent as to the meaning of that language,'" referencing Fernandez v Price, 63 AD3d 672 quoting Chimart Assoc. v Paul, 66 NY2d 570.In this instance the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court "properly… [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, said the court, where the language in the collective bargaining agreement "is 'reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation, extrinsic or parol evidence may be then permitted to determine the parties' intent as to the meaning of that language,'" referencing Fernandez v Price, 63 AD3d 672 quoting Chimart Assoc. v Paul, 66 NY2d 570.In this instance the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court "properly… [read post]