Search for: "Filler v State" Results 81 - 100 of 179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
If they will not do it on their own, Congress and the state legislatures must prod them into it by adopting such standards by legislation. 3. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:39 am by Ron Coleman
 He focuses rightly on the seminal case of American Waltham Watch Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Palmer used twitter to announce his plan to sue after the state election. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Administrator
The Forensics of Verbal Fillers Broadly stated, speakers tend to use the verbal fillers uh and um when something has interrupted the enormously complicated task of speech production. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976 [4th Dept 1988]). [read post]