Search for: "Fisher v. Fisher (Concurring And Dissenting Opinion)"
Results 81 - 98
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2010, 12:26 pm
Thompson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:01 am
She explained that she does not agreed with the standardized test for stare decisis in Chief Justice Kelly’s opinion in Peterson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 3:00 pm
On Saturday, July 31, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
In his dissent this Term in Renico v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
” Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
” Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:54 pm
Even though only 12 of the 27 judges have written or signed onto opinions dissenting for concurring from the denial (and hence whose votes we know for sure), we can devine there's a fair number of votes to take it en banc. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
STEVENS, J., GINSBURG, J., and BREYER, J., filed opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 3:06 pm
" In his opinion for the majority last month, Justice Anthony M. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:51 pm
Fisher. [read post]
2 May 2008, 12:03 pm
Chalk this up towards evening the score, I guess.Judge Tallman writes the majority opinion, Chief Judge Kozinski concurs, and Judge Fisher dissents. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 6:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
Bea concurred and dissent, finding that a waiver had occurred after the statement (although there was a mysterious "turning off the tape recorder). [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
What's more, the four justices who dissented from other parts of the Lohr opinion agreed with this result. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
VAIDIK, J., dissents with opinion. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:06 pm
The case is Arave v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 2:08 pm
Then, making it three for three for the day, Judge Ferguson dissents from Judge Fisher's opinion in this IDEA case.Can't we all just get along? [read post]
