Search for: "Fisher v. Young"
Results 81 - 100
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
Yesterday, in Fisher v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Answer: I stress in the book that the Roberts Court is still a “young” Court in some ways. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am
Briefly: Stephen Wermiel has a new post in this blog’s SCOTUS for law students series, contrasting Fisher v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
The Economist reports on Fisher v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 5:02 pm
Under the principle in Derbyshire v Times Newspapers, public bodies cannot sue for libel. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 3:20 pm
A little while ago the IPKat's New Zealand friend Ken Moon (AJ Park) wrote to draw his attention to the decision last December in Fisher & Paykel Financial Services v Karum Group LLC [2012] NZHC 334 on software copyright and misuse of confidential information. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am
Sidhu raises two concerns with the “critical mass” argument invoked to justify the affirmative action program under challenge in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 8:57 pm
In short, if, for God knows what reason, the Supreme Court justices are sitting in Washington, taking a break from working on their opinions in the Fisher case to read the blog arguments in favor of affirmative action in law review article selection, shouldn't they conclude that Grutter v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
The 9th rejected this argument, as it had in Young v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
Finally, a nod in the direction of the Oxford Human Rights Hub, whose most recent piece looks at the American Supreme Court affirmative action case of Fisher v University of Texas. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:10 am
One of them is before the Court in Fisher v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:33 am
It explains the case of Fisher v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:24 am
Smith; concurrence by Fisher with B. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:05 pm
The Court will hold a hearing on the case of Fisher v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Trial2006-03-27 Judd v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:58 am
See Cook v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:04 am
The recent cert grant in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:02 am
The case at issue is Fisher v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:27 pm
Attorneys who don't object, even after Fisher, risk being found to have been ineffective. [read post]
