Search for: "Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick" Results 81 - 100 of 343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 2:24 pm
On April 27, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:36 am
Last week, the Supreme Court held in Kasten v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 9:30 pm by Wataru Aikawa
Fitzpatrick points to the 2013 case of American Express Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:28 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) JBol Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Health Protection Agency [2012] EWCA Civ 1 (12 January 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Thomas Brown Estates Ltd v Hunters Partners Ltd [2012] EWHC 21 (QB) (12 January 2012) Fitzpatrick & Ors v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 12 (QB) (11 January 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) SB Corporate Solutions Ltd v Prescott & Anor… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:47 am by Ted Frank
CCAF filed an opposition to the request (citing Professor Fitzpatrick's recent article disapproving of excessive appeal bonds), and I was in St. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"Recovery in quasi-contract ordinarily is precluded “when a valid and enforceable written contract” governs the specific subject matter (Clark-Fr‘Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 3:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"*  New York State Senate Republican Campaign Committee, Petitioner v Commission To Investigate Public Corruption, Respondent, Supreme Court, New York County, Index Number 159965/2013. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:40 am by Ilya Somin
For those AALS and Federalist Society conference attendees who may be interested, here are the titles and times: Jan. 7, 1:30-3 PM: Panel on “What Will and Should Happen to Affirmative Action after Fisher v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 4:25 am
" *  New York State Senate Republican Campaign Committee, Petitioner v Commission To Investigate Public Corruption, Respondent, Supreme Court, New York County, Index Number 159965/2013. [read post]