Search for: "Frye v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2015, 1:46 pm
In this toxic tort litigation concerning the Pelham Bay landfill, we hold that the reports and findings of the expert epidemiologists and toxicologists satisfy the standard employed in Frye v United States, that of general acceptance in the scientific community. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:32 pm
The motion court denied the City's motions for summary judgment in all nine actions, stating that in the instant motion, the City raises no new facts or law to warrant a departure from the prior holding of the Appellate Division, First Department in NonnonI. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
As the Court of Appeals stated in People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 1:37 pm
In Parker v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:27 pm
Bernard stated that he was unaware whether this data was available or had been analyzed. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm
Neugebauer stated that the superiority of this type of proximity analysis was well-established. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
On a previous appeal, affirming the denial of defendants' motions to dismiss, inter alia, for failure to state a cause of action, we determined that plaintiffs' expert evidence did not require that a hearing be held in accordance with Frye v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 8:08 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 1:44 pm
United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
United States, 121 U.S.App. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
Rule 702 should have settled the debate over Daubert, as this rule for the admissibility of expert testimony is far stricter than any rule that existed in any jurisdiction in the United States before Daubert came out. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:05 am
Download the opinion: United States of America v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm
As stated by the Court of Appeals in Alejandro, this third requirement is also known as the prima facie case requirement. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 4:27 am
United States, unpublished Sixth Circuit decision regarding prejudice under the Lafler and Frye decisions, that made it onto Doug Berman’s radar at Sentencing Law & Policy. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:46 am
Green & Joseph Sanders, “Admissibility Versus Sufficiency: Controlling the Quality of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States,” (March 5, 2012) <downloaded on March 25, 2012>. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
United Airlines, Inc., 17 Fed. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:30 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 11:55 am
The abstract: Virtually every criminal conviction in the United States is the result of a guilty plea, not a jury trial. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
