Search for: "Garcia v. Does"
Results 81 - 100
of 896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2008, 11:46 am
(After correcting some minor errors in the opinion and adding a more careful caveat or two than I wrote in the original opinion.)What does that leave you with? [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 11:51 am
Nor, with respect to other counts, does one need to discuss the particular facts of this case.Instead, I'll summarize the Court of Appeal's central holding with a simple hypothetical:Imagine that I burglarize a house by entering an open sliding glass door, intending to steal a purse that I view therein. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:11 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:12 am
In the Garcia case, the New York Court of Appeals held that an officer does not have the ability to question individuals due to seemingly nervous behavior on the part of the vehicle occupants. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
The defendant also stated that he knew that Garcia did not have a job and that he basically sold drugs for a living.People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
Garcia, 2009 U.S. [read post]
21 May 2014, 11:42 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 3:04 am
Garcia, in Capitol v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:37 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
The court does note that it is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the duty-to-warn claim. __ This is a bombshell ruling and is similar in some ways to Garcia v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:05 pm
A new decision, Garcia v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 7:25 pm
Jeune v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:31 am
The 9th also does a useful analysis on the types of evidence the gov’t needed to prove presence (Garcia-Jimenez). [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
Via John Wesley Hall at the Fourth Amendment Blog, courtesy of Liberty and Justice For Y'all, the 5th Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am
DEMELLIER, JR., a/k/a BUD DEMELLIER; RAUL GARCIA, a/k/a RUDY GARCIA; NICOLE HARRISONG-ARCIA, Defendants-Respondents, and NEIGHBORHOOD RESEARCH CORP., d/b/a MOUNTAINTOP MEDIA; RICHARD K. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:58 am
E.g., Burrow-Giles v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:40 pm
Garcia challenged the denial arguing that the Insurance Code does not bar “innocent insureds” from recovering despite a coinsured’s wrongful acts. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:10 pm
Or, ‘It wasn’t me, it was the bailiff’.Choudhury v Garcia [2013] EWHC 3283 (QB) (June 2013) [Not on Bailii. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:27 pm
In State v. [read post]
