Search for: "Garcia v. Does" Results 81 - 100 of 962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2008, 2:50 pm
  The Court revisited the issue last year in Panetti v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 3:12 pm by Corynne McSherry
It's an old legal adage that bad facts lead to bad legal decisions, and today we've got a classic example in Garcia v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:51 pm by Andy
Back in last December, Ben told usabout the US Ninth Circuit's en banc hearing of the Garcia v Google appeal. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm
Dopson) we're talking about a seasoned trial lawyer who knew full well what she was doing.You may perhaps get away with it, as she does here. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:46 am
(After correcting some minor errors in the opinion and adding a more careful caveat or two than I wrote in the original opinion.)What does that leave you with? [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 11:51 am
 Nor, with respect to other counts, does one need to discuss the particular facts of this case.Instead, I'll summarize the Court of Appeal's central holding with a simple hypothetical:Imagine that I burglarize a house by entering an open sliding glass door, intending to steal a purse that I view therein. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:12 am by Michael DelSignore
In the Garcia case, the New York Court of Appeals held that an officer does not have the ability to question individuals due to seemingly nervous behavior on the part of the vehicle occupants. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
The defendant also stated that he knew that Garcia did not have a job and that he basically sold drugs for a living.People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The court does note that it is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the duty-to-warn claim. __ This is a bombshell ruling and is similar in some ways to Garcia v. [read post]