Search for: "George X. v."
Results 81 - 100
of 306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2020, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court issues its decision in Collins v Mnuchin. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:22 am
This is a guest post by Professor Andrea Biondi and Michael Bowsher QC, King’s College London, Professor Christopher Yukins, George Washington University Dr Luca Rubini University of Birmingham and PhD candidate Gabriele Carovano, King’s College London. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:04 pm
[2] ESG topics include, among other topics: (i) racial, gender and LGBTQ diversity and equity; (ii) human capital management (including worker health protection and care, job position and pay equity, job safety and workforce retirement planning); (iii) executive compensation; (iv) human rights; (v) the opioid crisis; (vi) gun control; (vii) drug pricing; (viii) political contributions; (ix) lobbying; (x) environmental concerns, including climate change, sustainability and… [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Many of these examples are more about association or dilution than confusion—this person stood for X and is being used for Y. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm
In the following guest post, Jason Symons, Persia Navidi, Claudia George, and Luke Roper of the HWL Ebsworth law firm take a look at the possibilities for COVID-19-related securities class action lawsuits in Australia. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm
It appears that sometimes reporters were singled out as they sought to cover the protests and demonstrations that erupted around the world after George Floyd’s death-by-knee in Minneapolis. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:20 am
Silk, and Sabastian V. [read post]
10 May 2020, 6:00 am
Büchel and the 5Pointz Michelangelos v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
Proof of Facts 3d 319, George A. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
Proof of Facts 3d 319, George A. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
Proof of Facts 3d 319, George A. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:38 am
He was campaigning against George W. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:00 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 2:08 pm
" Typically, you compare and contrast: Rule X doesn't apply, whereas the text of Rule Y seems straightforward and governs.At the end of the opinion, Justice Sanchez tells us what period does apply. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
Recent practice during the George W. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:11 pm
The 1988 regulations were never implemented because in 1991 George H.W. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:30 pm
Love Field.The Supreme Court is now considering whether it wants to review Love Terminal Partners v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:47 pm
This familiar situation was addressed by the Court of Appeal in X (A Child) v. [read post]
