Search for: "Gill v. US" Results 81 - 100 of 599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Schachtman
Kelly,[1] in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who may well have been the first judge to grapple with a litigation attempt to use meta-analysis to show a causal association. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
The State of Rhode Island is allowing this woman to go forward with a lawsuit against me for damages  due to 'injury to her feelings,' because people not associated with Turtleboy contacted her without us asking them to do so. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 2:22 pm by Giles Peaker
You may recall Kassam v Gill & Gill, featuring ‘Remove a Tenant’. [read post]
If we are lucky, the Supreme Court will use Benisek and Rucho to decide whether political gerrymandering claims are justiciable — whether the federal courts can serve as a check on the political process and safeguard a baseline conception of the effectiveness of the right to vote — and not duck the issue as it did last term in Gill v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:22 am by Kaylan Phillips
The timing could not be better as the 2020 census approaches. * * * Past cases linked to in this post: Gill v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm by Amy Howe
Many court-watchers thought that the justices might settle the issue of partisan gerrymandering once and for all, or at the very least provide more guidance, last term, in Gill v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
There are other big cases in the wings and it looks like 2019 will be a bumper year for defamation litigation: Craig McLachlan v Fairfax and the ABC, Chau Chak Wing v Fairfax and the ABC, Ben Roberts-Smith v Fairfax, Sarah Hanson-Young v David Leyonhjelm, John Herron and John Gill v HarperCollins – to mention a handful. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 7:48 am by Daily Record Staff
Gill Bright, of involuntary manslaughter, the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony or crime of violence, and the ... [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 3:32 am by SHG
Chief Justice John Roberts dismissed academic research as “sociological gobbledygook” in a recent case affecting redistricting in the states, Gill v. [read post]