Search for: "Givens v. Spencer"
Results 81 - 100
of 288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm
A few recent cert. petitions have asked the Court to reconsider the doctrine, and the Court has called for a response in at least two of them, Spencer v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court case (South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
Way back in November, before the Court of Justice of the European Union had given its ruling in the Google AdWords case, Mr Justice Arnold contrived to ask a mammoth list of no fewer than ten questions of that Court, in the Chancery Division (England and Wales) dispute between trade mark owner Interflora and ever-so-cheeky AdWord purchaser and retail giant Marks & Spencer. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:40 pm
Things like this come up from time to time, Like Spencer v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:40 am
Although wordy and filled with dicta, the decision foreshadows ongoing litigation on the parameters of the act after a decade of relative quiet since the Fair Share Act was passed.In the case of Spencer v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:29 pm
Flynn argues that, while the defense invokes Waller v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:12 am
Spencer, 2014 SCC 43 R. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 7:05 am
These measures were the focus of a wide-ranging Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter) attack by several applicants in the Federal Court case of Spencer v Canada (Health), 2021 FC 621 (CanLII). [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
On Friday, June 13, 2014, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a landmark decision (R v Spencer) upsetting common interpretations of a provision of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) that had been relied upon for many years as permitting pre-warrant disclosures of subscriber information by Internet Service Providers and other organizations in response to police requests. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 11:50 am
Rushforth argues that, given the nature of the motion, the defense has to position it as a motion for continuance: the hearing cannot continue until Hadi has his choice of counsel. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:53 pm
In Business Roundtable v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:35 am
Leeds Group v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:57 am
Warley, Pierce v Society of Sisters, and Meyer v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
The second case is Luis v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Goes back 4 years to Obama v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 11:36 am
In the recent decision of Saadi v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:31 pm
(W.D.N.Y.) held yesterday in Spencer v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 2:30 am
” With these words in his concurring opinion in Whitney v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:11 am
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by a majority given in the judgment of Lady Rose. [read post]
