Search for: "Governing Board v. Brennan" Results 81 - 100 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am by Karen Tani
Among the cases he worked on in the 1953 term was Barsky v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:03 pm by Lawrence Taylor
“The net effect of sobriety checkpoints on traffic safety is infinitesimal and possibly negative,” wrote Justices Paul Stevens, William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall in their Michigan v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 8:03 am
Of course, that same instinct led him to support Franklin Roosevelt's Court-packing plan and to side with the government in Dennis v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
At the Brennan Center, Andrew Cohen writes that the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Flowers v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
A Pentagon spokesman stated that, while the government plans to make payments after the completion of the Pentagon investigation, he did not know if the government would be "differentiating patient by patient. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
According to a Brennan Center Report, as of September 27, lawmakers had enacted at least 33 laws with restrictive provisions in 19 states. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by David Greene
The Court acknowledged that officials had in effect reinstated the long-discredited law of seditious libel (the crime of criticizing the government). [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
Board of Education on the basis of "neutral principles. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Amicus brief of the Brennan Center for Justice Amicus brief of Walter Dellinger and James Sample Amicus brief of New York et al. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
This was first made clear in Justice Brennan's opinion in Speiser v. [read post]
Examples: a brief by originalist scholars in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Robert Jackson, who had replaced Stone on the bench, systematically disassembled Frankfurter’s reasoning in his majority decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]