Search for: "Graves v. Department Of Corrections"
Results 81 - 100
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 8:05 am
In Trump v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
Paul Alan Levy: read the policy narrowly: a threat directed to a country, not an individual or group.Hypo: Global Center for Nonviolence: posts a video, with a thumbnail showing a mass grave. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
In Simien v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
The court never stated abuse to Lemus could not produce the requisite grave risk to A.O.L., but, instead, recited the correct legal standard. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Not only does it seem correct as a matter of principle, but also the lack of a lawful power to detain is likely, without more, to give rise to practical difficulties. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Attorney's Off., 2018 NY Slip Op 00895, Appellate Division, First Department, a public officer may be entitled to claim absolute immunity as a defendant in a lawsuit under certain circumstances. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
It is therefore not the task of the Board to decide whether the Examining Division reached the correct decision in refusing postponement, but simply to judge whether it used its discretion in accordance with the right principles and in a reasonable manner (see e.g. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
It is therefore not the task of the Board to decide whether the Examining Division reached the correct decision in refusing postponement, but simply to judge whether it used its discretion in accordance with the right principles and in a reasonable manner (see e.g. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
The Court of Appeal held this to be a correct state of the law and their Lordships agree. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am
Ohio v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
There was no question that the hearing officers findings were correct; Petitioner was guilty of all charges and specifications. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
The court expressed “grave doubts” as to whether an appellant could effectively run his case without giving oral evidence to the tribunal. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
National Security Judge Shedd’s dissent, which was joined by Judges Niemeyer and Agee, charged that the majority opinion disregards the “potentially grave consequences for our country. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Citing Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as though fully set forth below. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein as though fully set forth below. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
i The Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the presidency are spare, and in every formal sense, at least, Donald J. [read post]
