Search for: "Gray v. Gray et al" Results 81 - 100 of 244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Excessive tax rates on cigarettes approach de facto prohibition in some states, inducing black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
PhillipsThe Court of Appeals of the State of Missouri Western District (Fed Ct)April 1, 2008JANE DOE I, ET AL., RESPONDENTSv.THOMAS PHILLIPS, ET AL., DEFENDANT,JAMES KEATHLEY, APPELLANT.Appeal From: Circuit Court of Jackson County, The Hon. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:58 am by pscamp01
Bogle et al. pay thrity -five per cent ad valorem on “sauce. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
[mailto:m.ledford3@ledfordlaw.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:11 AMTo: Thomas McCarten Kerr, EsqCc: Barry MerchantSubject: Sony BMG et al. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 10:54 am by Schachtman
(ordering plaintiffs to “produce the documents sought by the Forest defendants to verify the validity and accuracy of the study known as “Berard et al., Sertraline Use During Pregnancy and the Risk of Major Malformations, Am. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:30 pm
But this ain't one of them.The attorneys in Benton faced particularly poor timing, though, as Vice Chancellor Strine had encountered a very similar issue the day before in a hearing for SinoMab Bioscience Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:27 pm
When Caitlin Halligan came to the podium to argue on behalf of respondents Eurodif et al., the Justices focused on what the Chief Justice described as the "substance versus formality question. [read post]